Showing posts with label war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war. Show all posts

Friday, 5 February 2016

War with Iran?

Article from PressTV:
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/02/05/448836/Iran-wants-oil-payments-in-euros-only-

 Why does this mean possible war or invasion of Iran?  Well when Iraq and Libya stopped trading oil in US dollars and switched to Euros or other currencies they were swiftly invaded, overthrown and switched back to payments in dollars.

If you ain't a clue what I'm on about or why it matters, my blog post "Petrodollar Warfare" from a couple of years ago is still relevant and will explain. http://jonnybrand.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/petrodollar-warfare.html

Saddam Hussein sealed his fate when he announced in September 2000 that Iraq was no longer going to accept dollars for oil and decided to switch to the Euro as Iraq’s oil export currency.
The Iraq war began March 2003; Baghdad fell in April; by June Iraq was now selling oil in dollars again.

.....Good luck Iran!!! 

Wednesday, 9 September 2015

It all makes sense now!

This short article I found by stop the war coalition explains exactly why the Obama regime and the Cameron regime are yet again bombing in the Middle East.  It should help clear up any confusion you may have, a quick 30 second read will put it all into perspective.....   

 

Why we're bombing Iraq and Syria: Obama and Cameron clear up any confusion 

Obama and Cameron remove any misunderstanding about why the United States and Britain are bombing in the Middle East again.


You may be confused about why we are bombing Iraq and Syria. So we will make ourselves very clear.

We support the Iraqi government in the fight against ISIS. 

We don't like ISIS, but ISIS has been supported by Saudi Arabia, whom we do like, and Saudi Arabia is now supporting us in bombing ISIS.

We don't like President Assad in Syria. We support the fight against him, but not ISIS, which is also fighting against him. 

We don't like Iran, but Iran supports the Iraqi government against ISIS. 

So some of our friends support our enemies and some of our enemies are our friends, and some of our enemies are fighting against our other enemies whom we want to lose, but we don't want our enemies who are fighting our enemies to win. 

If the people we want to defeat are defeated, they might be replaced by people we like even less.
And all this was started by us invading Iraq to drive out terrorists who weren't there until we went to drive them out. 

We hope you now understand.

Friday, 14 August 2015

Britain needs more immigrants

3000 refugees in Calais trying (most without success) to get to Britain.

Italy and Greece have taken 125,000 refugee arrivals since January 2015.

Meanwhile 57 million people have been displaced worldwide in different crises.

So bearing in mind the above the British media make a fuss about a handful of people in Calais?  Even worse the British Government refuse to take our share of refugees whilst desperate people are dying in boats on the Mediterranean Sea.  So why should we help these people?  Well apart from humanitarianism and a moral obligation, Britain played a big part in creating the problem.  Britain led NATO's military intervention in Libya and backed the Syrian civil war.

The South of Libya has become a haven for terrorists, and the Northern coast a center of migrant trafficking.  Refugees are fleeing a dangerous, lawless Libya or have made treacherous journeys through Libya from countries like Eritrea. 

Not so long ago Gaddafi's Libya had become the richest, most prosperous country in Africa. 
In 2011, the West’s objective was clearly not to help the Libyan people, who already had the highest standard of living in Africa, but to oust Gaddafi, install a puppet regime, and gain control of Libya’s natural resources.
In 1967 Colonel Gaddafi inherited one of the poorest nations in Africa; however, by the time he was assassinated, Gaddafi had turned Libya into Africa’s wealthiest nation with the highest life expectancy on the continent. Less people lived below the poverty line than in the Netherlands.
For over 40 years, Gaddafi promoted economic democracy and used the nationalised oil wealth to sustain social welfare programs for all Libyans. Libyans enjoyed free health care, free education, free electricity and interest-free loans amongst other things. Now thanks to NATO’s intervention Libya is a failed state with it's infrastructure in ruins.

Many millions were spent destroying Libya, but nothing was spent rebuilding it after.  Gaddafi may well have done some dubious things too but Libya were far better off before the bombs started dropping that's for sure. 

Libya was bombed the 'help' the Libyan people but now when they get to our doorstep we are refusing to help them.

The same can be said for Syria where huge numbers are fleeing to Europe.  We didn't officially invade Syria but Britain backed the 'rebels' to try and overthrow Assad.  That turned out well didn't it?  Money, weapons, training and support to rebels who later turned out to be terrorists.  A chaotic civil war that Britain have been fighting by proxy has displaced millions of innocent people.

Will we welcome the refugees who are fleeing Syria?  Imagine being scared and desperate enough to flee your own home, leave your country, never see friends ever again, travel for months in treacherous uncertain conditions, you finally reach the promised land..... and they turn you away.

Sunday, 9 November 2014

Why I won't wear a poppy

Why will I not wear a poppy? Why am I not comfortable with Rememberance Day?

Not to be disrespectful to people who died in the world wars but because I feel the way it's done does not pay respect in the right way, it's all wrong and for several different reasons.

We have learnt nothing, we have been locked in perpetual warfare ever since.  
Not poppies, but navigating away from imperialist military projects will do a much better job of honouring the memory of the fallen and respecting war veterans.

The red poppy was adopted to commemorate the First World War, chosen because of its common appearance in the barren wastes of the killing fields of France and Belgium. This was the ‘war to end all wars’, conducted at a catastrophic level of human loss and suffering, with millions bereaved, physically or mentally injured.
But instead of starting a period of peace, the war marked the beginning of a century of war and the development of nuclear weapons. This country has been involved directly in wars for the past 13 years, wars which have become increasingly unpopular at home, and which have failed even in the most basic of their declared aims.  On Remembrance Day, the politicians who today are promoting wars - whether it be in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya or Syria - will stand solemnly at the Cenotaph. They will wear their red poppies in the week that Britain has been bombing Iraq, and has announced that it is sending troops back to the country it spent ten years helping the United States destroy, killing up to one million Iraqis.

Millions of people have visited the Tower of London to witness the 888,246 ceramic poppies in the moat making up ‘The Blood Swept Lands and Sea of Red’ instillation, which only remembers British and Commonwealth soldiers.  Why do the British think like this? What about the French, the Germans, the Russians, the Polish, the Japanese? Were those lives less important? This also seems to be sanitising the memory of a brutal and futile war, which would perhaps be more aptly remembered by filling the moat with barbed wire and bones.

The Government is unveiling commemorative paving stones laid in the birth places of those members of the British Empire forces in World War I who received the Victoria Cross for their bravery. The government’s stated aims are to “provide a lasting legacy of local heroes” and “honour their bravery”. All 627 Victoria Cross recipients will be honoured over the next four years, with the promise that “no hero will be forgotten”.
This represents another remaking of Great War commemoration, it turns the emphasis from grief at a costly tragedy to lionisation of the warrior. It is a move that has more to do with the contemporary politics of militarism than with any genuine attempt to honour the memory of those who lost their lives between 1914 and 1918.

The tragedy of World War I needs remembering - but not in a way that reinforces militarism today. It is fitting to recall Siegfried Sassoon’s verdict on an earlier government’s attempt to memorialise the dead, the Menin Gate in Belgium.

Who will remember, passing through this Gatethe unheroic dead who fled the guns?

The poet threw his Military Cross into the Mersey in 1917 as part of what he described as “an act of wilful defiance of military authority". His sombre verdict on what the fallen may have thought of the Menin Gate’s “peace complacent stone” is worth recalling as the government of today lays paving stones around the country

The UK's biggest arms company, BAE System has in the past sponsored national poppy appeals and donated to fund-raising drives.  This year they will be sponsoring the annual Poppy Ball white tie dinner, and specific offices and arms factories will be hosting their own local events.
Arms companies do not do this because they care about the war dead, they do it because it is good for their business. By agreeing to take money from arms companies these organisations are giving practical support and a veneer of credibility to an industry that profits from the same war and repression that they seek to commemorate.

To sum it all up the Royal British Legion (RBL), the charity that promotes the red poppy, has got Joss Stone - accompanied by Jeff Beck on guitar - singing a version of Eric Bogle's classic anti-war song 'The Green Fields of France' but with its anti-war message removed!  Yes, it's true!
The RBL titles the song 'No Man's Land' and the last verse of the song deriding our perpetual wars has been deemed not relevant. The First World War was to be the "war to end all wars". Instead, as this missing verse highlights, it heralded a century of virtually endless war;

Ah young Willie McBride, I can’t help wonder why, Do those that lie here know why did they die? 
And did they believe when they answered the cause, Did they really believe that this war would end wars?  
Well the sorrow, the suffering, the glory, the pain,The killing and dying, were all done in vain. 
For Willie McBride, it all happened again, And again, and again, and again, and again.

Sunday, 16 February 2014

Global Terrorists

The war on terror? War IS terrorism!  By far the biggest threat to world peace are the United States of America and their aggressive, twisted hunger for war which is cloaked with a properganderous media front of democracy, moral obligation and peace keeping intervention.

Below is a list of US wars, invasions and military interventions since world war II, have a look through and see how many of these conflicts started with any country initiating war militarily against America. Without being any kind of historian I'll take an uneducated guess that it's somewhere around the zero mark.

The news you hear will imply that countries like Iran, Cuba, North Korea and even Russia are amongst the bad boys when actually it's the US, Britain, Israel and France that incite, intervene in, and start the most war.

1950 Puerto Rico
1950-53 Korean War
1950-54 Indochina War
1953 Czechoslovakia
1953-75 Vietnam War
1953-75 Laos Civil War
1958 Lebanon Crisis
1960-65 Congo Crisis
1961 Cuba
1964-present Colombian Conflict
1965-66 Dominican Republic
1966-67 Bolivian War
1966-69 North Korea
1970-75 Cambodian Civil War
1979-89 Afghanistan (Soviet War)
1981 Libya
1982-84 Lebanese Civil War
1983 Grenada
1986 Libya
1987-88 Iran
1989 Libya
1989-90 Panama
1990-91 Iraq
1991-2003 Iraqi-Kurdish Conflict
1992-94 Somalia
1993-95 Bosnian War
1994-95 Haiti
1999 Yugoslavia
2001-present Afghanistan
2002-present Philippines
2002-present Somali Civil war
2003 Liberia
2003-11 Iraq
2004-present North West Pakistan War
2006-09 Somalian War
2007-present Trans Saharan War
2010-present Al Qaeda in Yemen
2011 Libya

Well! the US army have been busy haven't they?! Making the world a better, more peaceful place by killing millions of people.

Additional to this there are numerous 'covert' involvements where the US fueled or backed certain conflicts by supplying military or monetary aid according to their own interests such as 1981 El salvador, present day Syria, 1954 Guatemala, 1964 Chile, 2002 Venezuela coup

America loves war, they just can't stop!  And it's all in the name of peace, love and democracy!
Hurray!!!


Wednesday, 29 May 2013

Petrodollar Warfare

All the wars, all the corruption, the lies, the media brainwashing, the false flag events, illegal invasions, cries of terrorism, recessions, bank collapses and the road the world war 3 can be directly linked in some way to one thing - the petrodollar.
This subject is huge and has many tangents to fire off at but here's an attempt at a brief summary;
oil
The US dollar is backed by debt, unlike other countries America has no gold reserves to back the value of its currency and instead relies on a global demand for the dollar.  The federal reserve is not owned by the country, the government or the tax paying public but is in fact a private bank, it lends huge sums of money to the government and very literally creates more money out of thin air on the basis that the previous debt will be payed back.  These debts are now so vast they are impossible to ever pay back because the trillions of dollars required simply do not exist.  The one thing keeping the dollar and the whole American economy alive is global demand for the currency due to commodities conventionally being traded in dollars, namely oil and  trade of oil between countries is quoted in and directly linked to the value of the US dollar.
Now that's the basic system with I'm sure some oversights but it sets the scene for what follows, and basically what follows is war.

Saddam Hussein sealed his fate when he announced in September 2000 that Iraq was no longer going to accept dollars for oil being sold under the UN’s Oil-for-Food program, and decided to switch to the euro as Iraq’s oil export currency.  We all know what happened next of course, well we think we do anyway.  The 2003 invasion, the non existent WMD, the toppling of Saddam, the long drawn out occupation of Iraq, and the resulting 1 million Iraqis who have died as a consequence.  Anything else?  Erm... well yes actually..... In 2003 the Bush Administration implemented a switch for Iraqi  international oil sales to revert back to dollars instead of euros despite the fact that in mid-2003 the euro was valued approximately 13% higher than the dollar, and thus significantly impacted the ability of Iraq to finance rebuilding he countries infrastructure.
The Iraq war began March 2003; Baghdad fell in April; by June Iraq was now selling oil in dollars again
It is now obvious the invasion of Iraq had less to do with any threat from Saddam’s long-gone WMD program and certainly less to do to do with fighting International terrorism than it has to do with gaining control over Iraq’s hydrocarbon reserves and in doing so maintaining the U.S. dollar as the monopoly currency for the critical international oil market.
iraq oil

You get the general idea by now so apply this same thinking to many of the other US led wars, invasions, trade embargos and political interference and you'll find a pattern emerges.
LibyaGadaffi planned to cease selling Libyan oil in U.S. dollars instead demanding payment in gold-backed Dinars (a single African currency made from gold).  The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.  The US fed us some propaganda and then stamped on Libya.
Afghanistan - Why have troops stayed so long? The US needs control of Afghanistan to exert influence over Central Asian reserves. (It is estimated that the Caspian Sea basin has $12 trillion reserves of oil and natural gas.).  Important pipelines cross through the region and Afghanistan is not only adjacent to countries which are rich in oil and natural gas (e.g Turkmenistan), it also possesses within its territory sizeable untapped reserves of natural gas, coal  and oil. The US does not necessarily intend to steal anyone’s oil but the nation remains utterly dependent on oil trade continuing in the dollar.
As the US dollar continued to lose purchasing power over time, several oil-producing countries began to question the wisdom of accepting increasingly worthless paper currency for their oil supplies. Today, several countries have attempted to move away, or already have moved away, from the petrodollar system. Examples include IranSyriaVenezuela, and North Korea… or the “axis of evil” if you prefer to use  the words of the mainstream media.  Additionally, other nations are choosing to use their own currencies for oil like China, Russia and India among others.
Clearly America aren't going to declare war on China, Russia or India (or at least not for a long while yet) but you will no doubt be aware of political unrest in the other countries I mention.
Venezuela - (failed) US sponsored military coup against Chavez.  Attempts to rig presidential elections after the death of Chavez in favour of the pro US Capriles against the socialist Maduro (failed again)
Syria - US funded rebels fighting the Assad 'regime' along with Israeli military interference by US proxy.
North Korea - Strict sanctions and trade embargos justified by the axis of evil story and exaggerated claims of nuclear war threat
Iran - The list of sanctions against Iran is pages long. There is a corresponding bipartisan belief by US government officials that Iranian citizens will become so inflamed by the effects of the sanctions that they will rise up and topple their government but this has not proved to be the case and Iran partly work round many of the sanctions using alternative trade agreements with certain countries such as Turkey, Russia and China.  Iran is the next big war waiting to happen and America just needs to concoct a decent reason to get in there that will carry enough public and international support.


Ultimately the petrodollar is going out of the window bit by bit and without the artificial demand for the US dollar that this system creates the whole US economy will come crashing down with potentially devastating effects.  America imports two thirds of the oil it needs and when the dollar crashes foreign fuel will be too expensive, the petrol pumps dry up and chaos will ensue, starting with panic buying then progressively empty supermarket shelves, looting, social breakdown, martial law, public uprising (this is part of the reason why the government wants to disarm the public through new gun control measures) and of course there will be significant wide reaching global economic problems particularly for those countries whose currency is closely linked to the US dollar.

There's no avoiding this scenario once it is upon us and unfortunately it is already upon us.  This explains why there is so much desperation to stir political unrest and initiate wars. The world is like a chess board with pieces being strategically moved every day and currently it's only really the pawns that have been taken off the board with maybe a rook or two trapped into a corner.  World War 3 is only a matter of time.....



Sunday, 28 April 2013

Crossing your own red line is absolutely fine

So here we go..... we know what's coming because we've seen it all before.  Last time it was Bush and Blair and this time it's Obama and Cameron, different leaders, same regime, same intentions.
Remember the pretext for the Iraq war? Weapons of mass destruction, regime attacking their own people, the axis of evil, human rights atrocities, war crimes.  Of course you remember and that's why the talk we're hearing regarding Syria over the last few days sounds so familiar.

“We cannot stand by and permit the systematic use of weapons like chemical weapons on civilian populations”
No of course you can't condone that Mr Obama!  You must also have been outraged when the US military used devastating chemical weapons during its barbaric siege of Fallujah in Iraq!  The line was crossed when they used white phosphorus shells and an advanced form of napalm because they are both banned by international conventions and THAT was a war crime yes? men, women and children burnt alive.
The ongoing legacy of these weapons plagues the Iraqi people with huge increases in child leukemia and cancer, and an epidemic of nightmarish birth defects in Fallujah, Basra and the other cities subjected to a US military siege
“It’s limited evidence, but there’s growing evidence that we have seen too of the use of chemical weapons, probably by the regime.”
Aah now David Cameron is chipping in is he? "limited evidence", "probably by the regime", not really convincing me there Dave, sorry mate but no I won't be happy if you spend my taxes on intervening in Syria because there seems to be no evidence whatsoever.
syria
note that Assad does have big support from the Syrian people
 just like Gaddafi did in Libya
Obama has repeatedly stated Syrian use of chemical weapons would cross a red line and could move the US closer to military intervention in the Syrian civil war.  Now we're told chemical weapons have probably been used and await the next development..... we know it's all bullshit of course and don't forget that the rebels fighting against the Bashar al-Assad 'regime' are actually supported and encouraged by the US with a blatant intention to destabilise the region.
But why is there an interest in Syria? They're not a major producer of oil or gas, they're not a politically verbal or economic threat in the same way as Gaddafi and Libya, so whats going on?  Well look at it like this- Syria might not be a major power in the Middle East, but a Syrian uprising may determine the shape of the future regional 'energy map'.  The biggest losers in a successful war for regime change would be Iran, who recently signed a major pipeline deal with Syria and Iraq that is ultimately aimed at bringing Iranian gas to the Mediterranean Sea, and Russia, which has sought to expand its own influence in energy development in the region. Washington bitterly opposed this pipeline deal.
The obvious winners of regime change would be the US and its allies, together with the major Western based energy conglomerates.
Syria's geographic location offers Mediterranean access to landlocked entities in search of markets for their hydrocarbons and to countries seeking access to Europe without having to go through Turkey.  Opportunities in the region would be lost with a crushed Syria but more importantly new opportunities will emerge under a new Syrian regime.  The end goal of US imperialism and its NATO allies in Syria is to isolate and prepare for a far larger war against Iran, with the aim of imposing neocolonial control over the whole vast energy-producing region.
Keep watching and see where this red line is drawn, then watch a bit longer and see the very people who drew the line walk straight across it.  It's going to happen and you know it is.  When the war starts many thousands of people will die. Did someone say war crimes?

Friday, 26 April 2013

Can't just blame North Korea



north korea
The tensions in Korea this year are as it happens no
different than any other year, there are a series of threats and playground name calling every year between the North and South and they are both as bad as each other but at the moment the degree of political propaganda being tactically fed to the media on either side is just better publicised than usual. The North has a new leader in Kim Jong Un the eager young whipper snapper taking the reins from his deceased father and now rather predictably the US want to stick their oar in and will tell us all the nasty things the evil communist North are saying but omit the equally naughty things the heavenly US aligned South are saying.  This makes it sound as if Kim Jong Un is "Sabre rattling*" and using "bellicose rhetoric*" which is exactly the kind of propaganda the North are supposed to be famous for  (*obligatory use of current media buzzwords).  So North Korea make strong verbal threats whilst South Korea conduct joint military exercises with the US  firing artillery, drop anti-submarine bombs and engage in high-profile military manoeuvres.  So who are the antagonists here??


Add to this increasingly tougher UN sanctions penalising North Korean banking, travel and trade and is it any wonder they are defiantly testing their nuclear capabilities and boasting about the range of their missiles?



Don't forget the atrocities of the Korean war in the 1950's when the US came to the aid of the South and indiscriminately firebombed North Korea. The Pentagon was ordering the firebombing of North Korean cities more intensively than any of those it firebombed during World War II.  Shin Eui Ju, on the Chinese border was 95 percent destroyed, Pyongyang 85 percent, and Hamhung, an industrial city, 80 percent. By the end of 1951, there weren’t many bombing targets left in North Korea.  Nobody won that war and 3 million died as a result of it.

I'm not saying North Korea are innocent victims in all this but the point I make is why would they not set up to defend themselves?  America says they will not accept North Korea as a nuclear power and North Korea says its nuclear arms are a treasured sword that it will never give up which given the history and current situation any country would surely take the same stance.

Thursday, 10 May 2012

charity begins at home?

Whilst walking through town today i was asked at a stall set up in the market centre to make a donation to help wounded British soldiers who served in Afghanistan, I declined and went about my business.  Whilst browsing the shelves of Wilkinsons I decided I would go back and pose a question.
me: Does any of this money go to help war wounded Afghans?
army fella: No, no, its for British soldiers.
me: Oh right, that's a shame
army fella: erm, er, why's that?
me: Well they need a lot more help than British soldiers do don't they?
army fella: No not at all, its for wounded soldiers who served for our country!!
me: Yes but they have the support of living in this country, the affected Afghan people need much more help!
The man got annoyed at this stage and started raising his voice, as I walked away he was shouting something about the good work of the British army.  maybe I'm causing trouble but then maybe I feel better for spontaneously expressing an alternative point of view.

 I'm definitely in favour of charity but only where its needed most.  Afghans and Iraqis have seen their communities, infrastructures and economies decimated and the aid they are given is nowhere near enough.  British soldiers may well have gone through hard times but will already get support from the army and have relative luxury to return home to, but due to our pompous love of country stance we only recognise what our guys have gone through and not what's been left behind.

Don't get me wrong I know its all well meaning and in good spirit but I was quite amused by the fella's look of bemusement, he really didn't understand my point of view and that's how I expect the mindset of the majority of this country would be.  ignorance is bliss.

Friday, 20 January 2012

CYBER WAR

ww3 will be a cyber war. Anonymous downed FBI website because they took down megaupload. SOPA and PIPA is just the start. This is war.....

Sunday, 18 December 2011

that's IRAQ sorted out then

US troops have now withdrawn from Iraq.  so then lets hear about the WMD you found!  what?? but thats what the war was for....right?
oh dear how embarrassing! 
around one million Iraqis have died due to war since 2003, yep that's a million, a horrible human tragedy!
whats that? the 'official' figures used by the US are around 100,000?
oh well thats ok then
read this for an insight to the misleading IBC figures (IBC respectfully and caringly stands for Iraq Body Count)

The Iraq war has been a disastrous military adventure which has resulted in the loss of over 100,000* Iraqi civilians. Babies born in Fallujah suffer from terrible birth defects as a result of chemical weapons dropped there by the US. WMDs - non existent. Iraq is not a democracy by international standards. Its water and electricity infrastructure has been ruined due to the war. 

*according to the IBC figures, wink wink.  

But to summarise here's a quote from Barack Obama on the end of the war 
"everything that American troops have done in Iraq - all the fighting and dying, bleeding and building, training and partnering, has led us to this moment of success"

Yes that's right! He said "success"!!!

bbc report 

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

poppy lovers get shirty

What a load of bollocks!  Another media over reaction designed to wind up the nation and create a bigger story than it deserves.  FIFA have banned the England team from wearing a shirt featuring a poppy emblem when they play Spain on Saturday and now we even have David Cameron jumping on the band wagon thinking he's the people's voice. "Outrageous" says Cameron and the public are lapping it up without even wondering why FIFA can't allow it.
see link http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15643295.stm

Fifa decrees that shirts should not carry political, religious or commercial messages
"Such initiatives would open the door to similar initiatives from all over the world, jeopardising the neutrality of football,"
So before the England game there will be a wreath layed on the pitch, a minutes silence and then the players will wear a black armband and can wear a poppy on their training kit.  not enough???

"Wearing a poppy is an act of huge respect and national pride." says Cameron
Oh right its not just remeberence of people who died fighting a despicable and ignorable war its also a matter of national pride? why are we obsessed with national pride? the war was shameful, remembering it with a love of country stance is deplorable.  its very very sad that all those people died during such a horrible period in our history but just sometimes lets get things into perspective... this is about a football match.


Oh and erm... c'mon England!